Ohio residents have become accustomed to special interests’ dominance in state politics, with dark money outlays being just one of many tactics used by politicians of both parties. Recent revelations about legal dark money expenditures have elicited little public reaction and minimal legislative response, possibly due to a series of Statehouse controversies that have desensitized Ohioans.
The lack of public outrage could also be attributed to Ohio’s flawed lobbying laws, which fail to fully disclose the extent of special interests’ influence on legislation. In contrast, other states like California have more transparent lobbying laws that make it easier to track special interest spending.
For example, in 2023, four electric utilities in California spent nearly $13 million lobbying in Sacramento, compared to the $6.3 million General Assembly appropriation for Ohio’s Office of Consumers’ Counsel. This disparity highlights the lack of transparency in Ohio’s lobbying practices.
Despite the absence of significant public outcry, the current political climate in Ohio does not seem ripe for a reformer to emerge and rally voters around political change. The lack of a strong advocate for political reform further perpetuates the cycle of special interest dominance in Ohio politics.
Thomas Suddes, a former legislative reporter, emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability in Ohio’s political system. Without meaningful reform and stronger lobbying laws, Ohioans may continue to face a state government controlled by special interests.
Source
Photo credit www.daytondailynews.com