In a recent decision, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that “boneless” chicken wings can still contain bones. This groundbreaking verdict came after a customer filed a lawsuit against a restaurant for serving bone-in chicken wings when they had ordered boneless ones.
The court explained that the term “boneless” refers to the fact that the meat has been removed from the bone, not that the wings are completely bone-free. They emphasized that customers should not expect boneless wings to be completely boneless. Additionally, they noted that when customers order boneless wings, they are aware that the meat may still have small pieces of bone.
This ruling has sparked a conversation about the labeling of food items and the expectations that customers have when ordering certain dishes. It also raises questions about how restaurants should accurately describe their menu items to avoid any confusion or misinterpretation.
Overall, the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision serves as a reminder to consumers to be aware of what they are ordering and to ask questions if they have any doubts about the menu items. It also serves as a warning to restaurants to clearly label their dishes to avoid any potential misunderstandings.
This verdict has brought attention to the terminology used in the food industry and how it can impact customer expectations. It will be interesting to see if this ruling has any ripple effects in other states or if it prompts restaurants to change how they label their dishes in the future.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com