Rental Agreement Dispute: A Communication Breakdown
In a recent inquiry to R. Eric Thomas, a homeowner expressed concern over a year-long rental arrangement with a financially strained tenant. The landlord charges $400 monthly for a room—significantly lower than the local market rate of $1,000. According to the rental agreement, the landlord covers two-thirds of the utility bills, while the tenant pays a third.
However, after spending the summer away visiting family, the tenant announced upon her return that she would not be contributing to the utility bill for the months she was absent, citing she wasn’t residing in the home during that time. Although the homeowner preferred to avoid confrontation and initially let it slide, the incident negatively impacted her perception of the tenant’s character.
Eric Thomas addressed the situation, pointing out that the issue lies more in communication rather than character assessment. He noted that the tenant may have felt justified in her reasoning, as paying for utilities while not occupying the room seems logical, especially considering her financial situation. Thomas highlighted the importance of clear expectations regarding utility contributions, encouraging the landlord to communicate openly about her stance on utility payments going forward.
He cautioned against creating tension over minor financial matters and suggested that, since the cost of extra utilities might not be a significant burden for the landlord, it would be more productive to hold a discussion with the tenant about expectations rather than dwell on character judgments.
Thomas invites readers to submit their questions to him directly via email or through his social media platforms, emphasizing the importance of clear communication in resolving conflicts.
Source
Photo credit www.cleveland.com