A whopping 98% of public comments submitted to state officials in Ohio oppose allowing additional fracking in Salt Fork State Park and two other preserved wildlife areas. With just nine comments in favor of the proposed oil and gas extraction, the overwhelming opposition reflects concerns about environmental and human health, noise pollution, and the impact on climate change. Despite the public outcry, state officials are set to vote on whether to open more land to fracking at these sites.
Commissioners must weigh public input against financial considerations, land use issues, and environmental concerns. Residents and advocacy groups have rallied against fracking on public lands, arguing that Ohio’s parks should be protected for future generations. The controversial decision follows a new law enacted in 2023 that enables state agencies to lease land for oil and gas development, resulting in millions of dollars in deals with gas drillers.
Critics of fracking argue that it is inconsistent with preserving clean, safe parks and wildlife areas. Proponents, on the other hand, highlight the economic benefits for local landowners and communities. The industry has invested billions in Ohio and works closely with local officials for economic development.
Despite conflicting opinions, the issue remains divisive, with concerns about public influence and the potential impact of fracking on the environment. As the commission prepares to make a decision, the public remains divided over the future of Ohio’s protected lands.
Source
Photo credit www.cleveland.com